You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In my experience in industry, Nichols plots have always been shown with the closed loop gain and phase response as the X-Y coordinates (essentially "unwrapping" the Nichols grid). This makes it easier to read off the closed-loop margins as opposed to squinting and trying to figure out how far between curved contour lines you are.
Instead of passing in the open-loop system Gol, the user can do this fairly easily right now by plotting the Nichols for their closed loop system Gcl = Gol/(1+Gol) and turning off the grid, so if people think this feature would just add confusion feel free to ignore.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As you noted, it's fairly easy to do something like ct.nichols(ct.feedback(g,1)), so I'm not sure we need to add this.
I am curious to know why you're interested in the closed-loop phase -- I normally only care about Bode magnitude plots of closed-loop systems, so I can see frequency and closed-loop gain crossover.
In my experience in industry, Nichols plots have always been shown with the closed loop gain and phase response as the X-Y coordinates (essentially "unwrapping" the Nichols grid). This makes it easier to read off the closed-loop margins as opposed to squinting and trying to figure out how far between curved contour lines you are.
Instead of passing in the open-loop system Gol, the user can do this fairly easily right now by plotting the Nichols for their closed loop system Gcl = Gol/(1+Gol) and turning off the grid, so if people think this feature would just add confusion feel free to ignore.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: