Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[6.2.x] Fix minor temporary directory security issue #8517

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Apr 3, 2021

Conversation

bluetech
Copy link
Member

@bluetech bluetech commented Apr 3, 2021

Backport of #8516.

This is only used in TempPathFactory.getbasetemp(). We'll be wanting
further control/care there, so move it into there.
…ions

(Written for a Unix system, but might be applicable to Windows as well).

pytest creates a root temporary directory under /tmp, named
`pytest-of-<username>`, and creates tmp_path's and other under it.
/tmp is shared between all users of the system.

This root temporary directory was created with 0o777&~umask permissions,
which usually becomes 0o755, meaning any user in the system could list
and read the files, which is undesirable.

Use 0o700 permissions instead. Also for subdirectories, because the root
dir is adjustable.
pytest uses a root temp directory named `/tmp/pytest-of-<username>`. The
name is predictable, and the directory might already exists from a
previous run, so that's allowed.

This makes it possible for my_user to pre-create
`/tmp/pytest-of-another_user`, thus giving my_user control of
another_user's tempdir.

Prevent this scenario by adding a couple of safety checks. I believe
they are sufficient.

Testing the first check requires changing the owner, which requires
root permissions, so can't be unit-tested easily, but I checked it
manually.
@bluetech bluetech merged commit 138b19a into pytest-dev:6.2.x Apr 3, 2021
@bluetech bluetech deleted the backport-mktmp branch January 21, 2022 12:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant