New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Release 4.6.0 #5350
Release 4.6.0 #5350
Conversation
Merge master into features
It was not really testing what it was supposed to test (e.g. the inner test was not run in the first place).
Merge master to fix CI
Merge master into features (make CI green again)
This can provide useful information, e.g. > could not import 'pyrepl.readline': curses library not found
Do not cut long help texts, but wrap them the same way as argparse wraps the other help items.
importorskip: display/include ImportError
tests: fix test_trace_after_runpytest
tests: harden test_nonascii_text
Improve output of ini options in --help
reportopts: A: put "Pp" in front
…ting The code ``` x = 0 assert x == 1 ``` will give the failure message 0 == 1, so it shouldn't be different as part of an unroll
pdb: move/refactor initialization of PytestPdbWrapper
Follow-up to c86d2da.
pytester: remove unused winpymap
tests: conftest: auto-add slow marker
Merge master into features
Followup to #4956.
…docs Add missing junitxml ini options to the reference docs
pytester: use temporary HOME with spawn
ci: Travis: add pypy3 to allowed failures temporarily
logging: Improve formatting of multiline message
Merge master into features
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #5350 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 94.12% 90.67% -3.45%
==========================================
Files 115 115
Lines 26303 26384 +81
Branches 2592 2607 +15
==========================================
- Hits 24757 23923 -834
- Misses 1229 2129 +900
- Partials 317 332 +15
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🎉
@nicoddemus an idea why |
No idea why, but let's wait for @blueyed's review regardless. 👍 |
Codecov likely got confused (reported -4% drop at https://codecov.io/gh/pytest-dev/pytest/pull/5350/changes). |
I'd say to wait for CI to pass before rebasing this for fixed changelogs (with regard to codecov). |
Ready for the release! 🎉 |
🎉 🎆 🎉 🎆 🎉