-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Docs builds failing #2001
Comments
I can imagine a few approaches that would correct the situation:
Those are in reverse order of my preference. The latter two options are the only ones that would support building any docs that reference the source code. In other words, the first two options only work because they avoid the setuptools code base. Option (4) is not readily viable, but might be through a custom builder. |
The custom build process only hooks into the |
In 1b85cac, I'm exploring option 3. I'm actually liking how much cruft that removes. I'm a little uneasy changing the install process at such an early state, but perhaps it's sufficient. If the tests pass and the docs build, I'm inclined to go with it. |
Looks like that approach isn't quite right. |
In this build, relying on jaraco.packaging 8.1, the issue is more apparent:
Adding the implicit bootstrap step (with its output), sullies the clean output of |
After running into some rather complicated issues, I'm ready to abandon the implicit bootstrap technique. In particular, given the variety of supported invocations of |
Since #1981, the docs builds are failing due to 'bootstrap' not having been executed.
When builds were passing previously, they were passing because
pip_install: false
prevented any attempt to install the package.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: