Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update PyPy versions, add macos arm64 PyPy #1369

Closed
mattip opened this issue Dec 7, 2022 · 6 comments · Fixed by #1372
Closed

Update PyPy versions, add macos arm64 PyPy #1369

mattip opened this issue Dec 7, 2022 · 6 comments · Fixed by #1372

Comments

@mattip
Copy link
Contributor

mattip commented Dec 7, 2022

Description

PyPy has released version 7.3.10 which includes macos arm64 versions. This release only has python 3.8 and 3.9.

Build log

No response

CI config

No response

@henryiii
Copy link
Contributor

henryiii commented Dec 8, 2022

Also CPython 3.11.1 is out - would make a nice update & release. :)

FYI, I'm on vacation this week so if it's up to me, likely will be early next week. Maybe someone else will be faster. :)

@mayeut
Copy link
Member

mayeut commented Dec 11, 2022

Update available in #1371
I'll prepare a PR with macos arm64 PyPy

@mayeut
Copy link
Member

mayeut commented Dec 11, 2022

@mattip, we're running into https://foss.heptapod.net/pypy/pypy/-/issues/3865 in the macOS tests on AppVeyor (using 10.14)

@mattip
Copy link
Contributor Author

mattip commented Dec 11, 2022

bummer. Is there a way to pin the macos-x86_64 image to 7.3.9?

@mattip
Copy link
Contributor Author

mattip commented Dec 19, 2022

It seems I will release PyPy v7.3.11 within two weeks, which should solve the macos-x86_64 problem.

@mattip
Copy link
Contributor Author

mattip commented Jan 1, 2023

PyPy 7.3.11 is out, it is worth trying to see if it works on the Appveyor images

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants