Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

πŸš€ 2.6.0b1 checklist βœ… #8549

Closed
10 tasks done
sydney-runkle opened this issue Jan 15, 2024 · 8 comments
Closed
10 tasks done

πŸš€ 2.6.0b1 checklist βœ… #8549

sydney-runkle opened this issue Jan 15, 2024 · 8 comments
Assignees

Comments

@sydney-runkle
Copy link
Member

sydney-runkle commented Jan 15, 2024

Collection of issues to complete + PRs to finish before the upcoming minor release:

Optional:

As a prerequisite, we'll do a V1 patch release, for which we'd like to finish these:

@sydney-runkle sydney-runkle self-assigned this Jan 15, 2024
@hramezani
Copy link
Member

If we want to do a V1 patch release, I suggest doing it before V2 2.6 release then we can include the latest V1 in pydantic.v1 namespace.

@sydney-runkle
Copy link
Member Author

@hramezani,

Good call. I've updated the issue description:

As a prerequisite, we'll do a V1 patch release, for which we'd like to finish these:

@sydney-runkle
Copy link
Member Author

@Viicos @romulocollopy,

I think there's some more work we need to do in order to get #6814 across the line, which is currently blocking ##6563.

Let's make these a priority for 2.7.0, which shouldn't come out too long after 2.6.0 πŸš€.

I've removed these from the list above.

@Viicos
Copy link
Contributor

Viicos commented Jan 16, 2024

#6563 might not be blocked by #6814 (depending of the usage of __name__), but it requires some review still so if you want to have 2.6 landing soon then yes it might be worth going for 2.7!

@sydney-runkle
Copy link
Member Author

@Viicos,

Let's stick with 2.7, but we focus on it soon after the release of 2.6 :). Looking forward to reviewing more thoroughly soon! πŸš€

@sydney-runkle
Copy link
Member Author

Everything here is done :). Marking this as closed, and will work on releasing 2.6 here shortly.

Thanks to everyone who has worked hard on this!

@einarwar
Copy link

Sorry for commenting on a closed issue. Do you have any expected release date for 2.6.0 @sydney-runkle? Some very anticipated fixes there for our project :)

@sydney-runkle
Copy link
Member Author

@einarwar,

No worries at all! We're releasing it today :). Keep an eye out for a tweet soon!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants