Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DEV: Remove unused Travis-CI configuration #747

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Apr 14, 2022
Merged

Conversation

MasterOdin
Copy link
Member

PR removes the .travis-ci.yml configuration file. The repo has moved to using GH actions for CI and to my knowledge does not use Travis-CI at all. Given that there's almost no reason one would want to go back to Travis (even if GH actions were to go away, there are much better free CI platforms now), no point leaving this this file around.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Peveler <matt.peveler@gmail.com>
@MartinThoma MartinThoma merged commit 7771fad into main Apr 14, 2022
@MartinThoma MartinThoma deleted the mpeveler/misc-travis branch April 14, 2022 16:21
@MartinThoma
Copy link
Member

I completely agree 👍

MartinThoma added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2022
Security (SEC):

- ContentStream_readInlineImage had potential infinite loop (#740)

Bug fixes (BUG):

- Fix merging encrypted files (#757)
- CCITTFaxDecode decodeParms can be an ArrayObject (#756)

Robustness improvements (ROBUST):

- title sometimes None (#744)

Documentation (DOC):

- Adjust short description of the package

Tests and Test setup (TST):

- Rewrite JS tests from unittest to pytest (#746)
- Increase Test coverage, mainly with filters (#756)
- Add test for inline images (#758)

Developer Experience Improvements (DEV):

- Remove unused Travis-CI configuration (#747)
- Show code coverage (#754, #755)
- Add mutmut (#760)

Miscellaneous:

- STY: Closing file handles, explicit exports, ... (#743)

All changes: 1.27.4...1.27.5
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants