Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make wait_for_less_busy_worker default #2940

Merged

Conversation

cafedomancer
Copy link
Contributor

@cafedomancer cafedomancer commented Sep 10, 2022

Description

Closes #2937.

Your checklist for this pull request

  • I have reviewed the guidelines for contributing to this repository.
  • I have added (or updated) appropriate tests if this PR fixes a bug or adds a feature.
  • My pull request is 100 lines added/removed or less so that it can be easily reviewed.
  • If this PR doesn't need tests (docs change), I added [ci skip] to the title of the PR.
  • If this closes any issues, I have added "Closes #issue" to the PR description or my commit messages.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • All new and existing tests passed, including Rubocop.

@cafedomancer cafedomancer marked this pull request as ready for review September 10, 2022 04:06
@cafedomancer cafedomancer changed the base branch from master to move-config-constants September 10, 2022 04:07
@nateberkopec nateberkopec merged commit 19cc8cc into puma:move-config-constants Sep 10, 2022
@nateberkopec nateberkopec linked an issue Sep 10, 2022 that may be closed by this pull request
nateberkopec added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2022
* Refactor/move configuration defaults

* Make wait_for_less_busy_worker default (#2940)

Co-authored-by: Shohei Umemoto <cafedomancer@gmail.com>
@cafedomancer cafedomancer deleted the make-wait-default branch September 10, 2022 04:57
texpert added a commit to texpert/florsan that referenced this pull request Oct 19, 2022
texpert added a commit to texpert/rails_6_rss_reader that referenced this pull request Oct 19, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Make wait_for_less_busy_worker default
2 participants