Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Control CLI Bug Fix #1416

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Sep 22, 2017
Merged

Conversation

hiimtaylorjones
Copy link
Contributor

@hiimtaylorjones hiimtaylorjones commented Sep 20, 2017

As per recent comments on this commit and a request by @nateberkopec on Twitter, this PR addresses a bug that was in control-cli.

The commit is fairly self explanatory, but there was an error in adding in the control-url arg. This PR fixes that typo.

@nateberkopec nateberkopec merged commit 459ab19 into puma:master Sep 22, 2017
@nateberkopec
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

jxa added a commit to jxa/puma that referenced this pull request Dec 15, 2017
- puma#1416 introduced a bug in pumactl
  the puma cli does not respond to `control-cli` option. On puma it is called `control`
- this commit puma@a8f54f7
  was correct, but it looked like a typo since the names of the options are not consistent across versions
- the best option for fixing this seems to be to support both options in the cli
- we don't want to stop supporting `control` in the cli for backwards-compatibility

- should pumactl be extended to support `control`? we don't need to worry about
  backwards compatibility for this one, but it could cause some confusion

-[] test
jxa added a commit to jxa/puma that referenced this pull request Jan 7, 2018
- deprecate `--control`
- add new option `--control-url`
- puma#1416 introduced a bug in pumactl the puma
  cli does not respond to `control-cli` option. On puma it is called `control`
- this commit
  puma@a8f54f7
  was correct, but it looked like a typo since the names of the options are not
  consistent across versions
- the best option for fixing this seems to be to support both options in the cli
- we don't want to stop supporting `control` in the cli for
  backwards-compatibility so it is deprecated
jxa added a commit to jxa/puma that referenced this pull request Apr 12, 2018
- deprecate `--control`
- add new option `--control-url`
- puma#1416 introduced a bug in pumactl the puma
  cli does not respond to `control-cli` option. On puma it is called `control`
- this commit
  puma@a8f54f7
  was correct, but it looked like a typo since the names of the options are not
  consistent across versions
- the best option for fixing this seems to be to support both options in the cli
- we don't want to stop supporting `control` in the cli for
  backwards-compatibility so it is deprecated
jxa added a commit to jxa/puma that referenced this pull request Apr 13, 2018
- deprecate `--control`
- add new option `--control-url`
- puma#1416 introduced a bug in pumactl the puma
  cli does not respond to `control-cli` option. On puma it is called `control`
- this commit
  puma@a8f54f7
  was correct, but it looked like a typo since the names of the options are not
  consistent across versions
- the best option for fixing this seems to be to support both options
- we don't want to stop supporting `control` in the cli for
  backwards-compatibility so it is deprecated
nateberkopec pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 9, 2018
- deprecate `--control`
- add new option `--control-url`
- #1416 introduced a bug in pumactl the puma
  cli does not respond to `control-cli` option. On puma it is called `control`
- this commit
  a8f54f7
  was correct, but it looked like a typo since the names of the options are not
  consistent across versions
- the best option for fixing this seems to be to support both options
- we don't want to stop supporting `control` in the cli for
  backwards-compatibility so it is deprecated
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants