Fix the syntax highlighting in the example #5276
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
AaronRobson
approved these changes
Jan 13, 2020
nateprewitt
approved these changes
Feb 1, 2020
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks @ZhukovAlexander, would you mind rebasing this onto master?
aless10
pushed a commit
to aless10/requests
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 19, 2020
Co-authored-by: Nate Prewitt <nate.prewitt@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Previously, dots were not included, which was breaking multiline syntax highlighting in for example in interactive mode. Example:
Here is how it looks after the fix:
