Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

INTERNAL ERROR: Black produced different code on the second pass of the formatter. -- long line with comparison to set subtraction of 2 sets #1877

Closed
AlbertoEAF opened this issue Dec 21, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
C: unstable formatting Formatting changed on the second pass R: duplicate This issue or pull request already exists T: bug Something isn't working

Comments

@AlbertoEAF
Copy link

AlbertoEAF commented Dec 21, 2020

Describe the bug

The following code is enough to trigger the bug:

e = dict()

assert {} == {"inputs", "outputs", "pipeline_execution_id", "results", "state", "task_config", "task_config_id", "id", "started_at", "updated_at", "finished_at"} - set(e[0].keys())

The bug doesn't show up if I either:

  • Use the right hand side (RHS) of the comparison alone.
  • Wrap the RHS in parenthesis.

Environment (please complete the following information):

  • Version: 20.8b1
  • OS and Python version: Ubuntu 18.04, clean virtual env with python3.7 + black

Does this bug also happen on master?

Yes

@AlbertoEAF AlbertoEAF added the T: bug Something isn't working label Dec 21, 2020
@ichard26 ichard26 added the C: unstable formatting Formatting changed on the second pass label Dec 25, 2020
@mvolfik
Copy link

mvolfik commented Feb 22, 2021

Works with #1958, so likely a duplicate of #1629

@ichard26 ichard26 added the R: duplicate This issue or pull request already exists label Apr 25, 2021
@ichard26
Copy link
Collaborator

Hello!

All reproduction cases in this issue format without error on master. The fixing commit was 8672af3 from PR GH-2126. I'll be marking this issue as a duplicate of GH-1629 since that's what GH-2126 aimed to fix and it's highly likely this issue falls under GH-1629.

Since we use the issue tracker as a reflection of what's on master, I'll be closing this issue. If you have any issues, especially with the new (but stable) output, please open a new issue. Oh and the fix should be available in a published release soon, see GH-2125 for more info.

Thank you for reporting!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
C: unstable formatting Formatting changed on the second pass R: duplicate This issue or pull request already exists T: bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants