Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Building with armv7l throws error #2736

Closed
ghost opened this issue Oct 19, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed

Building with armv7l throws error #2736

ghost opened this issue Oct 19, 2022 · 1 comment
Assignees
@tarunKoyalwar
Labels
duplicate This issue or pull request already exists Priority: Medium This issue may be useful, and needs some attention. Type: Bug Inconsistencies or issues which will cause an issue or problem for users or implementors. Type: Question A query or seeking clarification on parts of the spec. Probably doesn't need the attention of all.

Comments

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Oct 19, 2022

Hi Guys,

I just wanna let you know that when building the go package with armv7l I get following error:

github.com/projectdiscovery/nuclei/v2/pkg/utils/ratelimit
# github.com/projectdiscovery/nuclei/v2/pkg/utils/ratelimit
../go/pkg/mod/github.com/projectdiscovery/nuclei/v2@v2.7.8/pkg/utils/ratelimit/ratelimit.go:59:13: cannot use math.MaxInt64 (untyped int constant 9223372036854775807) as int value in struct literal (overflows)
../go/pkg/mod/github.com/projectdiscovery/nuclei/v2@v2.7.8/pkg/utils/ratelimit/ratelimit.go:60:13: cannot use math.MaxInt64 (untyped int constant 9223372036854775807) as int value in struct literal (overflows)

Best
@ghost ghost added the Type: Bug Inconsistencies or issues which will cause an issue or problem for users or implementors. label Oct 19, 2022
@ehsandeep ehsandeep added the Priority: Medium This issue may be useful, and needs some attention. label Oct 20, 2022
@Mzack9999 Mzack9999 added the Type: Question A query or seeking clarification on parts of the spec. Probably doesn't need the attention of all. label Oct 20, 2022
@tarunKoyalwar
Copy link
Member

Hii @DeC1pher , this issue seems to be similar to #2747 .
This was caused to a delayed dependency update . It is fixed now . If you still facing issues feel free to create new issue .
I am closing it since this is resolved

@tarunKoyalwar tarunKoyalwar self-assigned this Dec 2, 2022
@tarunKoyalwar tarunKoyalwar added the duplicate This issue or pull request already exists label Dec 2, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@tarunKoyalwar tarunKoyalwar

Labels
duplicate This issue or pull request already exists Priority: Medium This issue may be useful, and needs some attention. Type: Bug Inconsistencies or issues which will cause an issue or problem for users or implementors. Type: Question A query or seeking clarification on parts of the spec. Probably doesn't need the attention of all.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@ehsandeep @Mzack9999 @tarunKoyalwar