Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Alternative downloads section is confusing #61

Open
gmethvin opened this issue Mar 21, 2016 · 1 comment
Open

Alternative downloads section is confusing #61

gmethvin opened this issue Mar 21, 2016 · 1 comment
Labels
status:backlog

Comments

@gmethvin
Copy link
Member

All the newer play versions point to activator on the download page. I don't think that makes sense, as the links don't correspond to the Play versions at all, and it's really unclear how you would use activator to create a project with that specific play version.
@Dulya
Copy link
Contributor

Dulya commented Oct 7, 2017 •
edited

We can add a link called 'instructions' with each of the version heading (eg. 2.6 [link]instructions ) so that we can point the user to the installation instructions for each minor version, in this case https://www.playframework.com/documentation/2.6.x/Installing

Approach simiar to this
image

@Dulya Dulya mentioned this issue Oct 7, 2017
Merged
gmethvin pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 21, 2017
@Dulya @gmethvin
Issue #61 fix by adding an instruction link (#176)
3237fc5 
* added instruction link to each alternative download version headings from 2.3

* updated installation link for older versions

updated installation link for older versions and used documentation router to route to the corresponding documentation page

* added route to documentation index

In case of any mismatch (but won't happen)

* fix version mismatch and removed version hacks from documentation
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
status:backlog
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@gmethvin @dwijnand @Dulya