Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RUSTSEC-2022-0041: Unsoundness of AtomicCell<*64> arithmetics on 32-bit targets that support Atomic*64 #96

Closed
github-actions bot opened this issue May 26, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@github-actions
Copy link

Details
Package crossbeam-utils
Version 0.7.2
Warning unsound
URL crossbeam-rs/crossbeam#781
Patched Versions >=0.8.7
Aliases GHSA-qc84-gqf4-9926, CVE-2022-23639

Impact

Affected versions of this crate incorrectly assumed that the alignment of {i,u}64 was always the same as Atomic{I,U}64.

However, the alignment of {i,u}64 on a 32-bit target can be smaller than Atomic{I,U}64.

This can cause the following problems:

  • Unaligned memory accesses
  • Data race

Crates using fetch_* methods with AtomicCell<{i,u}64> are affected by this issue.

32-bit targets without Atomic{I,U}64 and 64-bit targets are not affected by this issue.

32-bit targets with Atomic{I,U}64 and {i,u}64 have the same alignment are also not affected by this issue.

The following is a complete list of the builtin targets that may be affected. (last update: nightly-2022-02-11)

  • armv7-apple-ios (tier 3)
  • armv7s-apple-ios (tier 3)
  • i386-apple-ios (tier 3)
  • i586-unknown-linux-gnu
  • i586-unknown-linux-musl
  • i686-apple-darwin (tier 3)
  • i686-linux-android
  • i686-unknown-freebsd
  • i686-unknown-haiku (tier 3)
  • i686-unknown-linux-gnu
  • i686-unknown-linux-musl
  • i686-unknown-netbsd (tier 3)
  • i686-unknown-openbsd (tier 3)
  • i686-wrs-vxworks (tier 3)

(script to get list)

Patches

This has been fixed in crossbeam-utils 0.8.7.

Affected 0.8.x releases have been yanked.

Thanks to @taiki-e

@radhermit
Copy link
Member

This is due to ipc-channel lagging on porting to a newer mio version.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant