Bump pino version from 6.0.0 to 7.0.0

[arty-name]

fixes #143

[mcollina]

please remove node 10

[arty-name]

Sure! Since Node 16 became LTS recently, I have also added it to the matrix, is that fine?

[mcollina]

You need to do https://github.com/pinojs/pino-http/blob/f43143e7cca538ed185ee67affec008a9df840c0/logger.js#L161 as well.

CI is still failing

[mcollina]

I think we can drop old API versions.

[arty-name]

I think we can drop old API versions.

What do you mean? Hapi 18 and 19?

[mcollina]

Yes, exactly

[arty-name]

I removed the older hapi versions, probably the Readme needs to be updated at some point.

The tests fail for me only on Node 16 with this error: The following leaks were detected:AggregateError, atob, btoa, AbortController, AbortSignal, EventTarget, Event, MessageChannel, MessagePort, MessageEvent, performance. Do you have an idea about addressing that?

[mcollina]

I think you need to update lab.

Can you also update the README?

[arty-name]

Indeed, the latest lab version does not have this issue!

[arty-name]

I am uncertain about this comment though, since it mentions a different package pino-http.

[mcollina]

The same block of code must be added here for everything to work.

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-0.1%) to 98.976% when pulling 096e842 on arty-name:fix-143-upgrade-pino into 7e9e699 on pinojs:master.

[arty-name]

Do you mean something like this?

[mcollina]

lgtm

[mcollina]

@lauraseidler can you take a look as well?

This is good to go for me.

[lauraseidler]

Sorry for the delay folks - I only have my mobile phone at the moment, but from a quick glance this LGTM.

Should we have a test for those lines added @mcollina ? Not sure if it's testable or why exactly it's needed.

[mcollina]

They are testable but likely something we should not really bring here. I'd be ok in landing as is.