Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add rule checking coalesces #36

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

leongersen
Copy link
Contributor

In a similar vein to #25, this adds a rule checking that the left side of a coalesce statement is actually valid.

Copy link
Member

@ondrejmirtes ondrejmirtes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Again, the rule isn't added to any level. Should be level 1.

src/Rules/Variables/CoalesceRule.php Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/Rules/Variables/CoalesceRule.php Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@leongersen leongersen force-pushed the coalesce-rule branch 2 times, most recently from 5702089 to dbcbfd9 Compare January 21, 2020 12:34
@leongersen
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ondrejmirtes, @BackEndTea I think I've addressed your comments on this PR, let me know if there's anything else you'd like me to improve. Thanks for your reviews so far!

@BackEndTea
Copy link
Contributor

How does this behave when the left side is a function call?

e.g.

$a = rand(0,1) ?? 10;

I'd expect an error here, as rand cant return null.

Also, how does this behave with 'always null'? e.g.

function (?string $a) : void
{
  if(!is_string($a) {
    $a ?? = 'foo';
  }
}

This always triggers are $a is always null here.

@leongersen
Copy link
Contributor Author

@BackEndTea Good points. I've added support for FuncCall, as well as PropertyFetch and StaticPropertyFetch. I've also added checks for "type is always null" everywhere.

Copy link
Contributor

@BackEndTea BackEndTea left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks pretty good to me, it even found a fault in the phpstan source code

@ondrejmirtes
Copy link
Member

Hi, I just merged it as: 3608ded

I made some mostly cosmetic changes to the error messages, and cover more cases. The core logic is really solid and I appreciate it, it couldn't be easy to come up with it! :)

I have more work to be done I will cover myself over this weekend:

  1. Reuse the same logic in existing VariableCertaintyInIssetRule.
  2. Report variables on level 1 and the rest on level 4. Currently all of this is reported on level 1.
  3. Create a new rule that reports the same things for isset() on level 4.

@leongersen
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ondrejmirtes Thanks a bunch for your help on this one!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
3 participants