Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Memory issue (PluginError: WebAssembly.instantiate(): Out of memory: wasm memory) #7

Closed
pekeq opened this issue Aug 14, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@pekeq
Copy link
Owner

pekeq commented Aug 14, 2021

Out of memory error occur like following:

(node:45565) UnhandledPromiseRejectionWarning: RangeError: WebAssembly.instantiate(): Out of memory: wasm memory
(Use `node --trace-warnings ...` to show where the warning was created)
(node:45565) UnhandledPromiseRejectionWarning: Unhandled promise rejection. This error originated either by throwing inside of an async function without a catch block, or by rejecting a promise which was not handled with .catch(). To terminate the node process on unhandled promise rejection, use the CLI flag `--unhandled-rejections=strict` (see https://nodejs.org/api/cli.html#cli_unhandled_rejections_mode). (rejection id: 1)
(node:45565) [DEP0018] DeprecationWarning: Unhandled promise rejections are deprecated. In the future, promise rejections that are not handled will terminate the Node.js process with a non-zero exit code.
(node:45565) UnhandledPromiseRejectionWarning: RangeError: WebAssembly.instantiate(): Out of memory: wasm memory
(Use `node --trace-warnings ...` to show where the warning was created)
(node:45565) UnhandledPromiseRejectionWarning: RangeError: WebAssembly.instantiate(): Out of memory: wasm memory
(Use `node --trace-warnings ...` to show where the warning was created)
failed to asynchronously prepare wasm: RangeError: WebAssembly.instantiate(): Out of memory: wasm memory
RangeError: WebAssembly.instantiate(): Out of memory: wasm memory
pekeq added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 14, 2021
@pekeq
Copy link
Owner Author

pekeq commented Sep 1, 2021

Changed the implementation to use a single pool.
Testing has not shown any problems, so I'll close this issue.
If the problem occurs again, open another case.

@pekeq pekeq closed this as completed Sep 1, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant