Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update popover in Password Strength demo #10071

Closed
thatblindgeye opened this issue Feb 8, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #10353
Closed

Update popover in Password Strength demo #10071

thatblindgeye opened this issue Feb 8, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #10353
Assignees
Labels
sm Tech debt improvements to code that do not affect either user or product developers’ experience.

Comments

@thatblindgeye
Copy link
Contributor

Describe the enhancement or change
Currently the popover in the Password Strength has content related to mentioning password requirements. In general that sort of content shouldn't be hidden in a popover and instead displayed below the input, which the demo is already doing.

We should either remove the help popover or update its content to something more along the lines of "why does a strong password matter" or something along those lines.

Is this request originating from a Red Hat product team? If so, which ones and is there any sort of deadline for this enhancement?

Any other information?

@thatblindgeye thatblindgeye added the Tech debt improvements to code that do not affect either user or product developers’ experience. label Feb 8, 2024
@tlabaj
Copy link
Contributor

tlabaj commented Feb 26, 2024

Let's remove the help icon and popover.

Copy link

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
sm Tech debt improvements to code that do not affect either user or product developers’ experience.
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants