Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove multistream-select extra roundtrip #2983

Open
tomaka opened this issue Nov 8, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Remove multistream-select extra roundtrip #2983

tomaka opened this issue Nov 8, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@tomaka
Copy link
Contributor

tomaka commented Nov 8, 2022

The smoldot multistream-select implementation doesn't support assuming that the remote supports the requested protocol. This means an extra round-trip every time a protocol is negotiated.

mergify bot added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 11, 2022
cc #2983

This PR removes some extra networking round-trips caused by
multistream-select.

The way multistream-select works is: we tell the remote that we would
like to use a specific protocol, and then the remote answers either yes
or no. No is only ever returned if the remote doesn't support the
protocol at all, which isn't supposed to happen unless we're talking to
a buggy node or to a libp2p-compatible-but-not-Substrate node.
Before this PR, we wait for the remote to send back yes or no. After
this PR, we don't wait and simply start sending the protocol-specific
data immediately after the request for a protocol, and assume that the
remote is going to answer yes.

The negotiation is still properly finished afterwards, so if it turns
out that the remote answers no, then we'll still get an error locally.
The drawback is that, if the remote answers no, the protocol-specific
data that we have eagerly sent will be interpreted as being from the
multistream-select protocol, which can lead to confusing decoding
errors. However, the trade-off is worth it.

I've done this change only for substreams after the connection has been
opened. There are two other unnecessary round-trips during the
connection opening, but considering that we don't open connections that
often they're actually less important. For this reason, I'll leave
#2983 open.

Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant