Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 22, 2021. It is now read-only.

Passing/failing threshold could be more accurate #834

Open
Tbaut opened this issue Jun 3, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Passing/failing threshold could be more accurate #834

Tbaut opened this issue Jun 3, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@Tbaut
Copy link
Collaborator

Tbaut commented Jun 3, 2020

I've had yet another look at the numbers, and I think this is how things should be calculated (example for super majority approval):

nc: nays with conviction
ac: ayes with conviction
n: nays without conviction
a: ayes without conviction
tot: total issuance

image

The current way is assuming a = ac --> calculate the number of aye with 1x conviction to make it pass.

A better way would be to calculate how many more ayes (1x conviction), on top of the current ayes, are needed to make it pass.

This would mean calculating.
x : the amount of ayes (1x conviction), on top of the current ayes
image

or with tu the turnout = (a+n):
image

Simplified, it's:
image
here

Example with real numbers:
image

Solution: x = 92 732 (on top of the 383 Ayes)

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant