Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

About the performace when using ants in websocket #126

Open
gitmko0 opened this issue Nov 7, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

About the performace when using ants in websocket #126

gitmko0 opened this issue Nov 7, 2020 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed question Further information is requested

Comments

@gitmko0
Copy link

gitmko0 commented Nov 7, 2020

Will websocket be written with ants be more performant than using solutions such as gobwas or fastws

With reference to go routines being used in websocket here
https://www.freecodecamp.org/news/million-websockets-and-go-cc58418460bb/
and also here:
https://github.com/dgrr/fastws/

I havent tried yet but do you think ants with websocket will be faster and more performant than them for high number of connections? e.g. 1M to 10M connections using ants for websocket.

@gitmko0 gitmko0 added help wanted Extra attention is needed question Further information is requested labels Nov 7, 2020
@panjf2000 panjf2000 changed the title Will websocket be written with ants be more performant than using solutions such as gobwas or fastws About the performace when using ants in websocket Nov 7, 2020
@panjf2000
Copy link
Owner

Please don't put the description in the issue title directly, which makes the issue title tedious.

Figure out the difference between title and description and put them in the right place separately.

@mi4tin
Copy link

mi4tin commented Jan 11, 2021

websocket is not good use ant

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants