You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I’m a regular user of both click and devdocs.io – I feel it would be great to have your documentation be integrated on there to make it more practically searchable offline.
Essentially, that service scrapes docs periodically, reformats them, and makes them available via a single interface.
Every page footer lists the original docs page, the license, and the copyright holders. For example the footer of the “10 minutes to pandas” page is:
It seems to me that the 3rd clause of the BSD 3-Clause License, would require Pallets to provide explicit written consent for this integration to be possible. The clause is as follows:
Neither the name of the copyright holder nor the names of its contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software without specific prior written permission.
To me a devdocs reproduction of your documentation could be considered a product derived from this software.
The name of the copyright holder is used, appropriately, to attribute the work of making the source documentation.
Whether that could count as “promoting” in some weird legalese sense of the word I’m not sure (I’m not a lawyer).
So before I start working on a PR to devdocs, would it make sense for whoever can take this kind of decision here (maybe @davidism ?) to reply including the click docs there is OK? Or am I overthinking this?
For what it’s worth, devdocs is free to use, ad-free, and hosted by a donor-supporter nonprofit, freeCodeCamp (of which I am not part, I just use devdocs and occasionally contribute to it.)
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Hi!
I’m a regular user of both click and devdocs.io – I feel it would be great to have your documentation be integrated on there to make it more practically searchable offline.
Essentially, that service scrapes docs periodically, reformats them, and makes them available via a single interface.
Every page footer lists the original docs page, the license, and the copyright holders. For example the footer of the “10 minutes to pandas” page is:
It seems to me that the 3rd clause of the BSD 3-Clause License, would require Pallets to provide explicit written consent for this integration to be possible. The clause is as follows:
So before I start working on a PR to devdocs, would it make sense for whoever can take this kind of decision here (maybe @davidism ?) to reply including the click docs there is OK? Or am I overthinking this?
For what it’s worth, devdocs is free to use, ad-free, and hosted by a donor-supporter nonprofit, freeCodeCamp (of which I am not part, I just use devdocs and occasionally contribute to it.)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions