Code style as refactored by Sourcery

[adbar]

Hi @Ousret, as I was looking for other things that could be made more efficient in the code I tried Sourcery on it.

The reasons why the code was changed are listed in the conversation here: https://github.com/adbar/charset_normalizer/pull/1

I just corrected the mypy type hints, otherwise I left it untouched. I have recently made good experiences with this kind of refactoring.

I particularly like the sum() operators introduced, the simplified if clauses, the yield from and the optimized range(). Concerning the any() I'm not sure if I prefer that style or the original.

Anyway, please have a look and make any changes you like, it's just machine work ;)

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #131 (1450470) into master (b89913a) will decrease coverage by 0.15%.
The diff coverage is 81.81%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #131      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   90.35%   90.19%   -0.16%     
==========================================
  Files          11       11              
  Lines        1171     1153      -18     
==========================================
- Hits         1058     1040      -18     
  Misses        113      113              

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
charset_normalizer/constant.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
charset_normalizer/cli/normalizer.py	73.91% <20.00%> (ø)
charset_normalizer/utils.py	84.44% <80.00%> (-0.26%)	⬇️
charset_normalizer/md.py	96.65% <92.30%> (-0.04%)	⬇️
charset_normalizer/api.py	90.05% <100.00%> (-0.16%)	⬇️
charset_normalizer/cd.py	96.31% <100.00%> (-0.18%)	⬇️
charset_normalizer/models.py	86.66% <100.00%> (-0.07%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update b89913a...1450470. Read the comment docs.

[Ousret]

LGTM, will do another review later,