You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Not a problem, pure enhancement request
Describe the solution you'd like
In assessing the security and trustworthiness of open-source libraries, two additional metrics should be considered: the diversity of contributors and the age of their GitHub accounts. This approach could offer early indicators of potential security risks, as seen in scenarios like CVE-2024-3094. While not foolproof—given the possibility of using older accounts for malicious purposes—these metrics serve as valuable signals. Specifically, libraries with contributions from newer accounts or from individuals with limited cross-project involvement could be flagged for closer scrutiny. Conversely, libraries benefiting from longstanding contributors with extensive cross-project activity should be deemed more reliable. This system recognizes the potential for false positives but aims to enhance overall security postures by identifying unusual contribution patterns indicative of risks.
Describe alternatives you've considered
I cannot think of an alternative, but hope to use this issue as a thread to conduct the conversation around this
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Not a problem, pure enhancement request
Describe the solution you'd like
In assessing the security and trustworthiness of open-source libraries, two additional metrics should be considered: the diversity of contributors and the age of their GitHub accounts. This approach could offer early indicators of potential security risks, as seen in scenarios like CVE-2024-3094. While not foolproof—given the possibility of using older accounts for malicious purposes—these metrics serve as valuable signals. Specifically, libraries with contributions from newer accounts or from individuals with limited cross-project involvement could be flagged for closer scrutiny. Conversely, libraries benefiting from longstanding contributors with extensive cross-project activity should be deemed more reliable. This system recognizes the potential for false positives but aims to enhance overall security postures by identifying unusual contribution patterns indicative of risks.
Describe alternatives you've considered
I cannot think of an alternative, but hope to use this issue as a thread to conduct the conversation around this
Additional context
Good visual for understanding the issue
Clear writeup
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: