You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A package manager which has found significant adoption over the last few years (in particular in High Performance Computing) is Spack (https://github.com/spack/spack). It supports over 7000 packages and is geared towards resolving complex dependency chains with a focus on building everything from source.
It would be nice if Spack could be recognized by Scorecard as a packaging mechanism, though I am unsure how difficult this would be. Spack recipies are hosted on github though, and for github hosted packages it manages one would usually find an entry in its pacakge.py file similar to this:
A package manager which has found significant adoption over the last few years (in particular in High Performance Computing) is Spack (https://github.com/spack/spack). It supports over 7000 packages and is geared towards resolving complex dependency chains with a focus on building everything from source.
It would be nice if Spack could be recognized by Scorecard as a packaging mechanism, though I am unsure how difficult this would be. Spack recipies are hosted on github though, and for github hosted packages it manages one would usually find an entry in its pacakge.py file similar to this:
I.e. it should be possible to simply search the package files of spack for matching entries to repository name/url, branch name and versions (tags).
Spack and Kokkos for what its worth are slated to be part of the High Performance Software Foundation umbrella in the Linux Foundation.
@tgamblin is the primary maintainer of Spack.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: