Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Show existing tags of an address (or POI) #11

Open
sfkeller opened this issue May 14, 2016 · 6 comments
Open

Show existing tags of an address (or POI) #11

sfkeller opened this issue May 14, 2016 · 6 comments

Comments

@sfkeller
Copy link

In case there’s already a POI at the address, existing tags should be shown.
This would prevent entries to mentiond infos which is already there in OSM.

@iandees
Copy link
Member

iandees commented Jan 30, 2017

This isn't a full editor for OSM, it simply adds (anonymous) notes.

Making onosm a full-fledged editor would be great, but I'm not sure I have the time for it.

@alexandre-mbm
Copy link
Contributor

Making onosm a full-fledged editor would be great

There are another options. onosm is what is.

@iandees
Copy link
Member

iandees commented Jan 30, 2017

There are another options

What did you have in mind?

@alexandre-mbm
Copy link
Contributor

alexandre-mbm commented Jan 30, 2017

I am not fluent in English. I am saying that is my opinion the onosm continuing as it is. I understood that you are talking about turns it in a full editor. No...

@sfkeller
Copy link
Author

I think, we can agree, that it's not about turning onosm into a full-fledged editor. That's why I wrote "showing existing tags", not editing. When updating, it's important that users see what's there already so that they can remember and don't update/add things twice.

@Mannshoch
Copy link

If a User found available OSM data, insert it into the Details tab. And only If these Data get a changed publish these data into a note.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants