Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

webhookDefinitions are not supported registry+v1=> plain+v0 #749

Open
DrummyFloyd opened this issue Apr 10, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

webhookDefinitions are not supported registry+v1=> plain+v0 #749

DrummyFloyd opened this issue Apr 10, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@DrummyFloyd
Copy link

DrummyFloyd commented Apr 10, 2024

Hi, OLM team!

OLM

version: 0.9.0

others components

catalogd_version=v0.12.0
cert_mgr_version=v1.9.0
rukpak_version=v0.19.0

behaviour

atm, this is not possible to use the latest operators from https://operatorhub.io/
when i try latest's one, i have this error

Message: convert registry+v1 bundle to plain+v0 bundle: webhookDefinitions are not supported

tested upon the following manifests.

---
apiVersion: catalogd.operatorframework.io/v1alpha1
kind: Catalog
metadata:
  name: operatorhubio
spec:
  source:
    type: image
    image:
      ref: quay.io/operatorhubio/catalog:latest
      pollInterval: 24h
---
apiVersion: olm.operatorframework.io/v1alpha1
kind: ClusterExtension
metadata:
  name: operatorhubio-argocd-operator
spec:
  packageName: argocd-operator
  version: 0.8.0
---
apiVersion: olm.operatorframework.io/v1alpha1
kind: ClusterExtension
metadata:
  name: operatorhubio-loki-operator
spec:
  packageName: loki-operator
  version: 0.6.0
---
apiVersion: olm.operatorframework.io/v1alpha1
kind: ClusterExtension
metadata:
  name: operatorhubio-gitlab-runner
spec:
  packageName: gitlab-runner-operator
  version: 1.15.1
@everettraven
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @DrummyFloyd - thanks for filing this issue! Currently operator-controller does not support registry+v1 bundles that contain webhooks but it is on our roadmap!

@DrummyFloyd
Copy link
Author

@everettraven thank you for your anwsers, actually @ Varsha already told me that, and asked me to create an issue , that's why =)

https://kubernetes.slack.com/archives/C0181L6JYQ2/p1712405237065129

hope, it will appears soon it the roadmap , because i want to managed many things with OLM v1, especially because OLM V1 is gitops compatible

@everettraven
Copy link
Contributor

Ah I see, thanks for filing the issue!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants