manifest: pull runc from the OCP repo

[miabbott]

The current version of runc getting pulled into RHCOS is an older
version coming from the rhel-8-appstream repo. We want to start
using correctly versioned packages from the container-tools stack
and this is the first step.

See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013822

[miabbott]

After this change:

Upgraded:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
  runc 1.0.0-74.rc95.module+el8.4.0+11822+6cc1e7d7 -> 1.0.0-98.rhaos4.8.gitcd80260.el8

Still need to sort out with Node/Containers team about getting the right rhaos4.10 version of the package in the plashet.

[saqibali-2k]

/lgtm

[miabbott]

Oct 14 14:00:40 qemu0 kola-runext-misc-ro.sh[1606]: + [[ -n runc-1.0.0-98.rhaos4.8.gitcd80260.el8.x86_64 ]]
Oct 14 14:00:40 qemu0 kola-runext-misc-ro.sh[1606]: + fatal 'Error: rhaos packages do not match OpenShift version'

As expected....I guess I should put this PR on hold until we get that sorted out.

[miabbott]

The OSE repo has an up-to-date version of runc available, so the CI jobs should start passing again.

Side-effect of this change is that we get crun pulled in as well (as desired by the Container Tools team).

[cgwalters]

/lgtm
But it still really seems to me that forking the container module by default for OCP is a long term bad strategy.
I mean, it already has to be a large burden on the container team to have multiple (traditional) RHEL streams for !OCP cases, on top of an OCP version. I guess the flip side is we don't actually really use podman except for bootstrapping, just runc.

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cgwalters, miabbott, saqibali-2k

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [cgwalters,miabbott,saqibali-2k]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment