ast/parser: fresh wildcards for chained function heads #5426
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This is a spiritual follow-up to open-policy-agent#5412. A policy like f(_) := 1 { true } { true } { true } would have been pretty-printed as f(_0) := 1 f(_0) := 1 f(_0) := 1 because of the duplicated wildcards. They now get the same treatment as "else" gets: fresh wildcards. Signed-off-by: Stephan Renatus <stephan.renatus@gmail.com>
philipaconrad
approved these changes
Nov 29, 2022
| var rules []*Rule | ||
|
|
||
| rules = append(rules, &rule) | ||
| rules := []*Rule{&rule} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is a small, but good refactoring. 👍
✅ Deploy Preview for openpolicyagent ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings. |
srenatus
deleted the
sr/ast/parser-new-wildcards-for-chained-func-heads
branch
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a spiritual follow-up to #5412.
A policy like
would have been pretty-printed as
because of the duplicated wildcards.
They now get the same treatment as "else" gets: fresh wildcards.