Installation error on Windows

[skriand]

Bug Report

Is the issue related to model conversion?

Not

Describe the bug

Can not install onnx package on Windows

System information

• Windows 11
• Python version: 3.10, 3.11 (from Microsoft Store)

Reproduction instructions

C:\Users\andre>pip install onnx
Collecting onnx
Downloading onnx-1.15.0-cp311-cp311-win_amd64.whl.metadata (15 kB)
Requirement already satisfied: numpy in c:\users\andre\appdata\local\packages\pythonsoftwarefoundation.python.3.11_qbz5n2kfra8p0\localcache\local-packages\python311\site-packages (from onnx) (1.26.2)
Requirement already satisfied: protobuf>=3.20.2 in c:\users\andre\appdata\local\packages\pythonsoftwarefoundation.python.3.11_qbz5n2kfra8p0\localcache\local-packages\python311\site-packages (from onnx) (4.25.1)
Downloading onnx-1.15.0-cp311-cp311-win_amd64.whl (14.3 MB)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 14.3/14.3 MB 10.9 MB/s eta 0:00:00
Installing collected packages: onnx
ERROR: Could not install packages due to an OSError: [WinError 3] The system cannot find the path specified: 'C:\Users\andre\AppData\Local\Packages\PythonSoftwareFoundation.Python.3.11_qbz5n2kfra8p0\LocalCache\local-packages\Python311\site-packages\onnx\backend\test\data\node\test_averagepool_3d_dilations_large_count_include_pad_is_0_ceil_mode_is_False\test_data_set_0'

Expected behavior

Installed onnx

[liqunfu]

It must be the path length. Are you about to reduce this "PythonSoftwareFoundation.Python.3.11_qbz5n2kfra8p0" to a mimnal? I understand that this file name is too long: test_averagepool_3d_dilations_large_count_include_pad_is_0_ceil_mode_is_False as well.

[ElieTaillard]

I have the same issue when I try to install onnx==1.14.0 with python 3.10 (from Microsoft Store)

This is the workaround I found:
https://stackoverflow.com/a/76452218/14338640

[greg-is-kub]

Thank you @ElieTaillard !

However is this necessary to bring all the tests files in the packages ? Its making it heavier and those are not conventionnally used in a package.
Could this issue be sorted by a small modification of the MANIFEST.in ? @justinchuby

[andife]

@greg-is-kub: There is work on a pr to remove the testdata from the package: #5970

[greg-is-kub]

@greg-is-kub: There is work on a pr to remove the testdata from the package: #5970

Superb ! Thanks for the notification @andife, I'll watch this issue then.
Have a good day !