Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support SPECIAL_JUDGE #377

Open
kmyk opened this issue Mar 2, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Support SPECIAL_JUDGE #377

kmyk opened this issue Mar 2, 2021 · 0 comments
Labels
difficulty:middle enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@kmyk
Copy link
Member

kmyk commented Mar 2, 2021

Description / 説明

We should support problems with special judges. e.g. writing #define SPECIAL_JUDGE "python3 path/to/judge.py" changes the command running for verification to $ oj test --judge-command="python3 path/to/judge.py" ./a.out, like other attributes ERROR. / #define SPECIAL_JUDGE "python3 path/to/judge.py" みたいなのを書けるようにするといいと思います

Motivation / 動機

Some problems require special judges but judge programs are not given, mainly AOJ. / AOJ の問題でほしいことがある

Other notes / その他

  • related AOJのスペシャルジャッジ対応 #30

  • Also should we add supports for typical cases, like comparing after sorting? This may have to be done in oj command?

  • こどふぉを犠牲にして錬成したライブラリくんです
    AOJ では AC したけど verify の都合上×が付いているhttps://t.co/b8oF2zcjU0

    — 普通のkome (@idat_50me) March 2, 2021

    テストケースと違うソート順だと oj-verify のチェッカーが死ぬ(どうしようもなさそう)

    — 普通のkome (@idat_50me) March 2, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
difficulty:middle enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant