Search on field with AND

[miraks31]

As documented (https://lunrjs.com/guides/searching.html):

• we must use something like 'tags:foo' if we want to search on field 'tags'.
• we must use '+foo +bar' if we want to search 'foo' AND 'bar'

I would like to search all documents having 'tags:foo' AND containing 'bar'.
I tried:

• 'tags:foo +bar' ==> WRONG result (Applied as a OR)
• 'tags:+foo +bar' ==> WRONG result (no result, may be because +foo is not a tag)
• '+tags:foo +bar' ==> SYNTAX ERROR (unrecognised field '+tags', possible fields: 'text', 'title', 'tags')

How should I do?
Is it a bug.

[olivernn]

First, check what version of Lunr you are using, term presence queries are only supported in version 2.2 and up.

Second, I think there might be a bug, you can try this out on the demo site:

Searching for documents with alan AND skylab: +alan +skylab returns just one result, this is correct. Restricting the term "alan" to the name field does not seem to work, the presence modifier seems to get ignored: +name:alan +skylab returns three results.

I'll take a closer look at this, thanks for reporting.

[miraks31]

Thank you for this quick answer.
For your information, I'm using lunr 2.1.5 (the version installed by npm install).
Regards.

[olivernn]

Yeah, 2.1.5 does not have term presence support, you will need to upgrade to 2.2.0 to get term presence support.

[miraks31]

Hi,
When I launch a "npm install" with a package.json file containing this:
"dependencies": {
"lunr": "latest"
}

Then, the version 2.1.5 is installed.
If I try to force the version to 2.2.0, I get an error.

How can I install lunr 2.2.0 for node.js?
Thank you in advance for your help.
And thank you for lunr (I like it).

[olivernn]

Lunr 2.2.0 is definitely on npm and tagged as latest, perhaps you have some kind of npm proxy/mirror that hasn't been updated?

[miraks31]

I successfully installed Lunr 2.2.0.

[olivernn]

I've just pushed 2.2.1 with a fix for the bug that caused the issues mentioned here, please take a look and let me know if you run into problems.

[miraks31]

Hi,

This works well.
Thank you for this VERY VERY fast correction !