Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BUG] ^7.20.3 no longer resolves local package first on install (workspaces) #3637

Closed
1 task done
rijkvanzanten opened this issue Aug 10, 2021 · 37 comments · Fixed by #4402 or nodejs/node#41925
Closed
1 task done
Assignees
Labels
Bug thing that needs fixing Priority 0 will get attention right away Release 7.x work is associated with a specific npm 7 release

Comments

@rijkvanzanten
Copy link

Is there an existing issue for this?

  • I have searched the existing issues

Current Behavior

In a workspaces based environment, for example:

.
+-- package.json
`-- packages
   +-- a
   |   `-- package.json
   `-- b
       `-- package.json

Running npm install b --workspace a will no longer install the locally linked package correctly. Instead, it'll use the version hosted on npm, or throw a 404 if you use a custom (unique) package name.

Expected Behavior

In <7.20.x, NPM would resolve the local package, and correctly alter package.json and package-lock.json.

Steps To Reproduce

With node v16.6.1 and npm 7.20.3 installed:

  1. Make a new directory
mkdir ./npm-install-debug
  1. Add a package.json
cd ./npm-install-debug
npm init -y
  1. Setup 2 workspace packages
npm init -w ./packages/a
npm init -w ./packages/b

(I used @rijk/a and @rijk/b as names, to avoid confusion with the existing packages a and b.)

  1. Run npm install in the root, to give it a chance to npm link all the packages (not sure if needed)
npm install
  1. Try installing @rijk/b as a dependency of @rijk/a
npm install @rijk/b -w @rijk/a
  1. See error...
npm ERR! code E404
npm ERR! 404 Not Found - GET https://registry.npmjs.org/@rijk%2fb - Not found
npm ERR! 404
npm ERR! 404  '@rijk/b@*' is not in the npm registry.
npm ERR! 404 You should bug the author to publish it (or use the name yourself!)
npm ERR! 404
npm ERR! 404 Note that you can also install from a
npm ERR! 404 tarball, folder, http url, or git url.

npm ERR! A complete log of this run can be found in:
npm ERR!     /Users/rijkvanzanten/.npm/_logs/2021-08-10T20_07_25_648Z-debug.log

If you install 7.20.2 or below (npm i -g npm@7.20.2), the above flow still works as expected.

Environment

  • OS: macOS 11.4, also seen in GitHub Actions
  • Node: v16.6.1
  • npm: 7.20.3 and up
@rijkvanzanten rijkvanzanten added Bug thing that needs fixing Needs Triage needs review for next steps Release 7.x work is associated with a specific npm 7 release labels Aug 10, 2021
@gribnoysup
Copy link

gribnoysup commented Aug 11, 2021

Running into the same issue without even trying to install specific packages inside the workspaces, just running npm install from the project root where some workspaces are not yet published / missing from the registry. If that's any help for triaging, here is a very verbose install log of a failed install

@ParadoxInfinite
Copy link

I could reproduce the result by using the steps in the issue.
After a bit of shallow debugging, I found that the error E404 is found even in v7.20.2, it is not thrown however. In the latest build v7.20.6, it is. So, not sure if this is intended or a bug.

Now, I did a bit more digging around and found there are a couple of interesting keys which differ between v7.20.6 and v7.20.2

In the parent node:

ArboristVirtualNode {
  name: 'a',
  packageName: '@paradox/a',
  version: '1.0.0',
  location: '',
  path: '/Users/paradoxinfinite/Documents/testing/packages/a',
  extraneous: true,
  dev: true,
  optional: true,
  peer: true,
  isProjectRoot: true,  // this field is not present in v7.20.2
  edgesOut: Map(1) { '@paradox/b' => { prod @paradox/b@^1.0.0 MISSING } },
  sourceReference: ArboristNode {
    name: 'a',
    packageName: '@paradox/a',
    version: '1.0.0',
    location: 'packages/a',
    path: '/Users/paradoxinfinite/Documents/testing/packages/a',
    isWorkspace: true,  // this field is not present in v7.20.2
    edgesOut: Map(1) {
      '@paradox/b' => { prod @paradox/b@^1.0.0 -> node_modules/@paradox/b }
    }
  }
}

I couldn't get any further than this, so if someone who knows the https://github.com/npm/arborist codebase better could help or point me out on where to look, that'd be great!

Finally, by the looks of it, this issue would be more relevant to https://github.com/npm/arborist, you could try raising an issue there!

@willnode
Copy link

I had a problem with Gatsby running with Workspaces.

npm i gatsby-cli -g
npm init -y
gatsby new a
gatsby new b

Then adding workspaces in package.json

Before dedupe

D:\m\a>npm list methods
gatsby-starter-default@0.1.0 D:\m\a
`-- gatsby@3.11.1
  `-- express@4.17.1
    `-- methods@1.1.2

After dedupe

D:\m\a>npm list methods
a@0.1.0 D:\m\a
`-- (empty)
D:\m\b>npm list methods
b@0.1.0 D:\m\b
`-- (empty)

Despite

D:\m>npm list methods
m@1.0.0 D:\m
`-- a@0.1.0 -> .\a
  `-- gatsby@3.11.1
    `-- express@4.17.1
      `-- methods@1.1.2

This broke my gatsby builds.

Unfortunately downgrading to 7.20.2 didn't work for me :( could be a separate issue.

My node is v14.17.3

@simllll
Copy link

simllll commented Aug 30, 2021

Anything we can do to get this fixed? Super annoying bug for us, I need to downgrade npm every few days due to this issue.

@rijkvanzanten
Copy link
Author

We temporarily updated our CI/CD pipeline to a locked outdated version of NPM to mitigate this:

      - name: Use Node.js
        uses: actions/setup-node@v2
        with:
          node-version: '16.x'

      # See https://github.com/npm/cli/issues/3637
      - run: npm i -g npm@7.20.2

https://github.com/directus/directus/blob/607e32ea36c115a9d6cf820a26475ebbf9e6e9ed/.github/workflows/release.yml#L36-L42

For what it's worth, OSS - Sprint 36 says it's due September 07, so lets hope for the best 🤞🏻

@simllll
Copy link

simllll commented Oct 5, 2021

Is there any status update to this issue? Will it be fixed? Is it not reproducable on your side? Or will this be the new intended behaviour? Thanks

all are actually in the same monorepo:

npm WARN
npm WARN Could not resolve dependency:
npm WARN @hokify/shared-components@"^1.2.9" from @hokify/pwa-core@1.2.10
npm WARN packages/pwa-core
npm WARN @hokify/pwa-core@1.2.6
npm WARN node_modules/@hokify/pwa-core
npm ERR! code E404
npm ERR! 404 Not Found - GET https://registry.npmjs.org/@hokify%2fuser-app - Not found
npm ERR! 404
npm ERR! 404 '@hokify/user-app@^1.2.10' is not in this registry.
npm ERR! 404 You should bug the author to publish it (or use the name yourself!)

@rijkvanzanten
Copy link
Author

I'm wondering if the regression that caused this might be related to #3881

@lukekarrys lukekarrys added Priority 1 high priority issue and removed Needs Triage needs review for next steps Priority 1 high priority issue labels Oct 12, 2021
@simllll
Copy link

simllll commented Oct 22, 2021

It seems it works without a package lock, as soon as there is one though, a second npm install fails .. this is such an annoying bug, please let me know what I can contribute to get this fixed.

@simllll
Copy link

simllll commented Oct 22, 2021

Another thing that I discovered:
it seems if package-lock is "not" identical to the actual packaeg version the lookup fails.
Our monorepo setup increases the version of e.g. @hokify/user-app.. but let's the package-lock untouched.
Another install now fails, as it seems that the version in package-lock is looked for, the local version is higher though..and therefore it probabaly tries to look it up on npm..where it also doesn't find the package.
I guess a rule in this case shuold be: ignore the version number for local packages?

@simllll
Copy link

simllll commented Oct 26, 2021

I found one workaround that seems to do it for now: we are using "file:../path/to/package" now instead for references to private packages. This is probably not a solution for everyone, but maybe it helps someone.

@rijkvanzanten
Copy link
Author

For what it's worth, the same problem persists on 8+ (just tested on 8.1.0)

herschel666 added a commit to villekulla-nma/booking that referenced this issue Nov 14, 2021
@eddyw
Copy link

eddyw commented Nov 23, 2021

omg, we wasted a lot of time yesterday on this (recently upgraded to npm 8)
If it's useful to anyone, what worked for us is to add the dependency manually to the package.json (of a workspace) file, then run npm i at the root.

@qinyang912
Copy link

'npx npm@7.20.2 install <local_package>' can temporarily solve this problem 😅

@SugarDarius
Copy link

Hello !

Tested on Windows with:
npm@8.1.2
node@16.3.1

Unfortunately the issue still persists :/

@jimfranke
Copy link

This issue still persists and is a major problem IMO when working with workspaces. Is this being looked in to?
Windows, npm@8.1.2, node 16.3.1

@bigtimebuddy
Copy link

Can we re-open this issue? This error still reproduces in 8.4.0.

To reproduce:

git clone https://github.com/bigtimebuddy/npm-bug-package-lock-only
cd npm-bug-package-lock-only
npm i npm@8.4.0 -g
npm test

Should throw the following error:

npm ERR! code E404
npm ERR! 404 Not Found - GET https://registry.npmjs.org/@tools%2fa - Not found
npm ERR! 404 
npm ERR! 404  '@tools/a@2.0.0' is not in this registry.
npm ERR! 404 You should bug the author to publish it (or use the name yourself!)
npm ERR! 404 
npm ERR! 404 Note that you can also install from a
npm ERR! 404 tarball, folder, http url, or git url.

Reference #3964

@ljharb ljharb reopened this Feb 1, 2022
@nlf
Copy link
Contributor

nlf commented Feb 3, 2022

ok, i think this pull request will fix the problem for real. #4371

it passes the test in your reproduction repo at least @bigtimebuddy, thank you for that! it was really helpful for tracking this down.

@nlf
Copy link
Contributor

nlf commented Feb 7, 2022

closing. this fix will be out in our next release later this week

@manolakis
Copy link

Can we re-open this issue? The problem is happening again with node 18.14.0 and npm 9.3.1.

@ljharb
Copy link
Collaborator

ljharb commented Feb 22, 2023

@manolakis have you tried npm 9.5?

@manolakis
Copy link

manolakis commented Feb 22, 2023

ok, I did a try in modern versions and seems to be fixed in version 9.4.2+

@DesignByOnyx
Copy link

I wanted to report that npm@8.19.4 (released 6 days ago, March 1, 2023) fixes this issue. I was previously on 8.19.3 and the issue went away after upgrading. A couple notes:

  • Thank you to the npm team for back porting the fix to version 8.x.
  • If you cannot upgrade, you can update your package.json files directly. The format is "<package_name>": "*" where the version number is "*". If you do this, npm will recognize it as a local dependency. I tested this prior to upgrading.

@SergkeiM
Copy link

SergkeiM commented Jul 4, 2023

@manolakis have you tried npm 9.5?

node: v18.14.2
npm: 9.5.0

Doesn't work...

npm --no-git-tag-version --save -w packages/core version 2.0.0
@org/core
v2.0.0
npm ERR! code E404
npm ERR! 404 Not Found - GET https://npm.pkg.github.com/@org%2fcore - npm package "core" does not exist under owner "org"
npm ERR! 404 
npm ERR! 404  '@org/core@^1.6.0' is not in this registry.
npm ERR! 404 
npm ERR! 404 Note that you can also install from a
npm ERR! 404 tarball, folder, http url, or git url.

npm ERR! A complete log of this run can be found in:
npm ERR!     /home/sergkeim/.npm/_logs/2023-07-04T11_38_53_258Z-debug-0.log

@szszoke
Copy link

szszoke commented Jul 14, 2023

I am having this issue with npm 9.8.0 as well.

@davidvpe
Copy link

same here 9.5.1

@LoganArnett
Copy link

This is happening again on v10.2.0

@lukekarrys
Copy link
Contributor

@LoganArnett can you open a new issue with your reproduction for this?

@gavenkoa
Copy link

node/16.14.0 with

# npm --version
8.3.1

has a problem. Upgrade to node/16.20.2 with

# npm --version
8.19.4

fixes the issue.

@DesignByOnyx
Copy link

FWIW - Node 16.x has reached the end of it's life and should not be used any more. Also npm can be upgraded independently of node by doing npm i -g npm@latest.

@philly-vanilly
Copy link

I am on latest node lts v20.10.0, 10.2.3 and this is still an issue. I suspect it is one with npm, not node though

@StanleyDharan
Copy link

No longer an issue on node v20.11.0 npm v10.2.4

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Bug thing that needs fixing Priority 0 will get attention right away Release 7.x work is associated with a specific npm 7 release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.