-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 416
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. Weβll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
β Banning users and guests - Overview #12291
Comments
If there is a possibilty to unban person, I'd say yes. Then we can mark them in search results as banned (with a reason e.t.c) and on click perform both: unban + invite. |
What if, a logged-in user gets blocked from an open conversation and then join the conversation as a guest? Shouldn't 1 and 2. be solved both with IP based approach ? |
Might be a special case, we can have IP block in optional addition when the conversation is public, but since multiple people could be on the same connection (offices, etc.) we need to be able to block individuals instead of IPs.
I think you misunderstood. I was referring to list the room e.g. in open conversations for the blocked user, similarly the name of a conversation the user got blocked from is not "private" I would say. Of course we need the option to unban attendees/IPs. But this can be burried in the moderation settings of the conversation |
How are we naming that feature user-facing (e.g. when showing it in the conversation settings to list all bans)?
Edit: |
Copying from #12292 (comment)
No, banning is not supported in one-to-one
Let's say 4k?
That makes sense
That's right, I never thought about this. The plan was to allow banning an IP. But yeah we don't have a record of the guests IP atm so we need to think a bit more about it. |
How to use GitHub
Overview
For 1. we will use an IP based approach, 2. can be solved by recording actor type+id, additionally we will log the moderator performing the ban, a timestamp and allow providing a text note.
Blocking a participant will not allow them to join the conversation. It is okay to be still shown in search results?
Tickets
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: