Navigation Menu

Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Sidekiq.service to reflect the more common use case of a user service #4938

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jul 8, 2021

Conversation

narath
Copy link
Contributor

@narath narath commented Jul 8, 2021

You recommend the use of capistrano-sidekiq. This uses a user service (which is likely a good idea for most users from a security perspective). In order to get it to work, changes need to be made to the Sidekiq.service file (and location).

I describe the challenges I had in this gist which can give you more context if needed.

You recommend the use of capistrano-sidekiq. This uses a user service (which is likely a good idea for most users from a security perspective). In order to get it to work, changes need to be made to the Sidekiq.service file (and location)
@mperham mperham merged commit 9a44071 into sidekiq:master Jul 8, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants