Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Left-hand Nav UX improvement #5

Open
patocallaghan opened this issue May 30, 2013 · 4 comments
Open

Left-hand Nav UX improvement #5

patocallaghan opened this issue May 30, 2013 · 4 comments

Comments

@patocallaghan
Copy link
Contributor

Hey,
how would you feel about me implementing the following UX improvement for the left-hand navigation?

Use localStorage to remember whether you've checked Show Description or not. Then each time you visit the site, if you checked the box previously, it will remember this and the descriptions will appear.

@millermedeiros
Copy link
Member

I would like it very much. I have a few ideas on the mdoc repository like keyboard navigation, load pages using ajax, etc... but I never found the time to implement it - I guess my day job is already too similar to these tasks so my motivation to do it on my free time is not that big...

Any improvement is highly appreciated.

@millermedeiros
Copy link
Member

I think we should also change the structure to share the same JS/CSS files between all the versions if possible (that way we don't need to re-implement the same features everywhere).. But I would be OK if the changes are done just for the future versions. We can always go back and improve things later.

@patocallaghan
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yep,

I'd be happy to work on these. Are you okay with a pull request per feature rather than one big one? Just means I can work on particular features as I get the time and I guess it would make reviewing easier.

Also just so I understand, these changes are to go into the mdoc repository rather than mout itself?

@millermedeiros
Copy link
Member

Sure, small pull requests are good. Can be on mout itself since our
"template" is a little bit different. Thx

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants