Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New image tag for elasticsearch clients 7.x #11

Closed
rsicart opened this issue Jul 6, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed

New image tag for elasticsearch clients 7.x #11

rsicart opened this issue Jul 6, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@rsicart
Copy link
Contributor

rsicart commented Jul 6, 2022

Hi @monotek

Actually I send logs to an Elasticsearch server (7.17.4) that I don't manage.

This morning I wanted to use the latest image v4.1.0 (built after #10) because I need a recent version of fluent-plugin-kubernetes_metadata_filter (2.11.1), but I get those errors:

The client is unable to verify that the server is Elasticsearch. Some functionality may not be compatible if the server is running an unsupported product.
2022-07-06 08:51:04 +0000 [error]: config error file="/etc/fluent/fluent.conf" error_class=Fluent::ConfigError error="Using Elasticsearch client 8.3.0 is not compatible for your Elasticsearch server. Please check your using elasticsearch gem version and Elasticsearch server."

From that error I understand that I should use an elasticsearch client 7.x (until the server is updated).

Could be possible to have an image tag which installs elasticsearch client 7.x along with fluent-plugin-kubernetes_metadata_filter 2.11.1? For example a new image tag 3.5?

Please let me know if it is possible

Thanks in advance!

@monotek
Copy link
Owner

monotek commented Jul 6, 2022

I dont want to relase a downgrade so you would have to to fork, build and publish your own image...

@rsicart
Copy link
Contributor Author

rsicart commented Jul 6, 2022

Well, that's unfortunate.

That would be also an upgrade for tags 3.x, not only a downgrade.

Could you please reconsider, just a little docker push with those versions.... 😄

@rsicart
Copy link
Contributor Author

rsicart commented Jul 13, 2022

Well, if there's nothing to do we can close this issue.

Thanks anyways!

@monotek monotek closed this as completed Sep 10, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants