Added a JUnit 4 rule #816
Added a JUnit 4 rule #816
Conversation
|
This is pretty cool, thanks a lot for submitting it! Would you mind also updating the docs here to mention that this can be done with JUnit 4 as well? Thanks again! |
|
Added a bit next to the JUnit5 section 😃 |
|
Beautiful, thanks a lot! ...I guess now the only thing left to do is figuring out why the tests are failing :) |
|
I've been digging a bit into this, and looks like parameter injection is not easy to achieve with JUnit 4. Would you be ok removing |
|
Agree, hopefully that should sort it. |
| import io.mockk.impl.annotations.SpyK | ||
| import io.mockk.verify | ||
| import org.junit.Rule | ||
| import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This should actually be org.junit.Test
| import kotlin.test.assertEquals | ||
| import kotlin.test.assertNull | ||
| import kotlin.test.assertTrue | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You need RunWith(JUnit4::class) here for the tests to pass
|
Thanks a lot for following up on this! |
I find myself using something like this in most of my personal projects, it saves a lot (okay not that much) boilerplate of calling
MockKAnnotations.init(this)andunmockkAll()in every JUnit 4 test case.I essentially copypasted the test case from the equivalent for
MockKExtension, let me know if that's not okay.