Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[New Feature Request] Tree View #5627

Open
reisraff opened this issue Oct 4, 2022 · 11 comments · May be fixed by #5996
Open

[New Feature Request] Tree View #5627

reisraff opened this issue Oct 4, 2022 · 11 comments · May be fixed by #5996
Labels
area/web kind/feature New features / enhancements

Comments

@reisraff
Copy link

reisraff commented Oct 4, 2022

Problem Description

Today we have the web interface, but we have a view of calls that is super hard do locate resources...

Proposal

The Idea is to add the feature maybe a feature toggle in where you can chose the view you prefer, those being... the actual view that we have, and the requested feature in this issue that would be the tree view

@reisraff reisraff added the kind/feature New features / enhancements label Oct 4, 2022
@reisraff
Copy link
Author

reisraff commented Oct 4, 2022

I am not sure what framework mitmproxy uses for frontend, but I've done a little search and I found some stuff that may will help:

@Prinzhorn
Copy link
Member

Sounds like a great idea!

I am not sure what framework mitmproxy uses for frontend

React. Code and instruction are here if you want to contribute https://github.com/mitmproxy/mitmproxy/tree/main/web

@raychanks
Copy link

Hi there, I would like to give this a try.

@reisraff
Copy link
Author

go ahead @raychanks I would do, but go ahead....

@raychanks
Copy link

@reisraff Oh I thought no one is working on this at the moment. If you're already on it, I can try to find other issues to contribute to 👍🏼. Don't want to waste your effort if there's already WIP, what do you say?

@reisraff
Copy link
Author

@raychanks go ahead.. I am not in this.

@Rishabhg71
Copy link

@reisraff @raychanks if none of you are woking on this i would take this issue and give a PR

@raychanks
Copy link

@RG7279805 I totally forgot about this. I haven't work on this yet, feel free to take it:+1:

@lups2000
Copy link
Contributor

Could I have a look at this?

@Prinzhorn
Copy link
Member

Could I have a look at this?

There is already a PR #5996
Would be great if you can check it out locally and leave feedback on it.

@lups2000
Copy link
Contributor

Could I have a look at this?

There is already a PR #5996 Would be great if you can check it out locally and leave feedback on it.

Hi, @Prinzhorn . yes I saw it and I am taking inspiration from it. However, the logic to filter the flows is missing. My idea for that consists in reusing the component FlowTable. So basically we group the flows by host and then inject a FlowTable for each group. makes sense?

@lups2000 lups2000 mentioned this issue Feb 20, 2024
4 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/web kind/feature New features / enhancements
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants