You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When using the inferrer with max_depth > 1, meaning that we propagate values for more than one level, the specializer produces erroneous graphs. The problem occurs with test_pow10 and also with the following:
The VM complains about a cycle in that case. When looking at the graph, some free variables also seem to point to inputs in the wrong copy, and the generation also seems a little non-deterministic. There is clearly a bug somewhere.
We will not try to fix this immediately, since max_depth=1 is probably the setting we want, at least for the time being, and no problems have been diagnosed yet in that situation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When using the inferrer with max_depth > 1, meaning that we propagate values for more than one level, the specializer produces erroneous graphs. The problem occurs with
test_pow10
and also with the following:The VM complains about a cycle in that case. When looking at the graph, some free variables also seem to point to inputs in the wrong copy, and the generation also seems a little non-deterministic. There is clearly a bug somewhere.
We will not try to fix this immediately, since max_depth=1 is probably the setting we want, at least for the time being, and no problems have been diagnosed yet in that situation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: