Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Show a failed activity log when deleting one blob under emulator #2409

Closed
v-limu opened this issue Dec 10, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

Show a failed activity log when deleting one blob under emulator #2409

v-limu opened this issue Dec 10, 2019 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
🪲 regression Issue was working in a previous version ⚙️ blobs Related to blob storage ⚙️ emulator Related to local emulators ❔ external Root cause of this issue is in another component, product, or service 📦 electron update required Requires updating to a newer version of electron 🧪 testing Found through regular testing
Milestone

Comments

@v-limu
Copy link

v-limu commented Dec 10, 2019

Storage Explorer Version: 1.11.1
Build: 20191206.5
Branch: dev/marayerm/electron7/packaging
Platform/OS: Windows 10/ Linux Ubuntu 18.04/ MacOS High Sierra
Emulator: 5.10.0.0
Architecture: ia32/x64
Regression From: Previous build (20191206.2)

Steps to reproduce:

  1. Make sure Storage Emulator(5.10.0.0) is started.
  2. Expand 'Local & Attached' -> 'Storage Accounts' -> '(Emulator - Default Ports)(Key)' -> 'Blob Containers'.
  3. Create a new blob container -> Upload a blob to it -> Try to delete the blob.
  4. Check the result.

Expect Experience:
Show a successful activity log.

Actual Experience:

  1. Succeed to delete the blob.
  2. The activity log shows 'Failed to delete...'.
    image
@v-limu v-limu added 🧪 testing Found through regular testing ⚙️ blobs Related to blob storage 🪲 regression Issue was working in a previous version ⚙️ emulator Related to local emulators labels Dec 10, 2019
@MRayermannMSFT MRayermannMSFT added this to the 1.12.0 milestone Dec 12, 2019
@MRayermannMSFT MRayermannMSFT added this to Committed in Storage Explorer via automation Dec 12, 2019
@MRayermannMSFT MRayermannMSFT moved this from Committed to Investigating in Storage Explorer Dec 16, 2019
@JasonYeMSFT JasonYeMSFT moved this from Investigating to Under Review in Storage Explorer Dec 16, 2019
@JasonYeMSFT JasonYeMSFT moved this from Under Review to Investigating in Storage Explorer Dec 16, 2019
@JasonYeMSFT
Copy link
Contributor

The issue is caused by an Electron bug electron/electron#21515.

A workaround for this bug will be implemented.

@JasonYeMSFT JasonYeMSFT moved this from Investigating to Under Review in Storage Explorer Dec 16, 2019
@JasonYeMSFT JasonYeMSFT moved this from Under Review to Verifying in Storage Explorer Dec 19, 2019
@JasonYeMSFT JasonYeMSFT moved this from Verifying to Investigating in Storage Explorer Dec 19, 2019
@JasonYeMSFT JasonYeMSFT moved this from Investigating to Blocked in Storage Explorer Dec 19, 2019
@JasonYeMSFT JasonYeMSFT added the ❔ external Root cause of this issue is in another component, product, or service label Dec 19, 2019
@JasonYeMSFT JasonYeMSFT modified the milestones: 1.12.0, 1.13.0 Jan 27, 2020
@MRayermannMSFT MRayermannMSFT modified the milestones: 1.13.0, 1.14.0 Mar 2, 2020
@MRayermannMSFT MRayermannMSFT added the 📦 electron update required Requires updating to a newer version of electron label Mar 2, 2020
@v-limu
Copy link
Author

v-limu commented May 7, 2020

This issue is fixed on build electron/8-20200507.4. So we close it.

@v-limu v-limu closed this as completed May 7, 2020
Storage Explorer automation moved this from Blocked to Done May 7, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🪲 regression Issue was working in a previous version ⚙️ blobs Related to blob storage ⚙️ emulator Related to local emulators ❔ external Root cause of this issue is in another component, product, or service 📦 electron update required Requires updating to a newer version of electron 🧪 testing Found through regular testing
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants