You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If aliases would be able to run multiple commands with conditional logic, many workflow specific commands (porcelain in git jargon) could be implemented by the user or his/her company.
Many current commands expect some idiomatic workflow which could be implemented as a default aliases if aliases allow for conditional logic and new command eg. is-same-revision <revision> <revision>
This change would externalize such workflow specific commands (and discussions) to user configurable defaults and be potentionaly replaced by user/company preferred workflow...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I actually just ran across this myself. I would very much like an alias that lets me do jj branch set main -r @- && jj git push -b main. Bonus points for allowing it to take the branch name as an argument or to figure it out from the log.
If aliases would be able to run multiple commands with conditional logic, many workflow specific commands (porcelain in git jargon) could be implemented by the user or his/her company.
Many current commands expect some idiomatic workflow which could be implemented as a default aliases if aliases allow for conditional logic and new command eg.
is-same-revision <revision> <revision>
This change would externalize such workflow specific commands (and discussions) to user configurable defaults and be potentionaly replaced by user/company preferred workflow...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: