Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use oss-fuzz #98

Open
marshallpierce opened this issue Feb 11, 2019 · 6 comments
Open

Use oss-fuzz #98

marshallpierce opened this issue Feb 11, 2019 · 6 comments

Comments

@marshallpierce
Copy link
Owner

They'll accept rust-base64: google/oss-fuzz#2145

@denniskempin
Copy link

I am looking through the supply chain of some of my projects to look for ways to contribute back.

Are you still interested in this? I just onboarded a project to oss-fuzz, I'd be happy to do another one.

@marshallpierce
Copy link
Owner Author

@denniskempin Yes, that would be great, thanks! This will be especially handy once SIMD-based (and therefore unsafe) engines are a thing.

@denniskempin
Copy link

Hi @marshallpierce! Onboarding was pretty easy, I got a working commit here: denniskempin/oss-fuzz@8ccaa5f

In order to interact with oss-fuzz infrastructure and receive access to the filed bugs you will need to provide a google account. See: https://google.github.io/oss-fuzz/faq/#why-do-you-require-a-google-account-for-authentication

Could you email me with a google email address you would like to use and a list of additional emails you'd like to add to the CC? My email is denniskempin@google.com

@denniskempin
Copy link

Pull request is up. Sorry for the delay: google/oss-fuzz#10693

@denniskempin
Copy link

denniskempin commented Jul 13, 2023

It sounds like they would prefer to use https://google.github.io/clusterfuzzlite/ for rust-base64 (which makes sense, a centralized infra for all OSS fuzzing is hard to maintain).

Unfortunately it does not support CircleCI. This could be set up with GitHub actions on this repo.

It may not be too much work to implement CircleCI support into ClusterFuzzLite though. That may be generally useful beyond rust-base64 anyway.

@marshallpierce
Copy link
Owner Author

If it's not too bad to use GitHub Actions just for fuzzing, that sounds like a good compromise -- I like fuzzing more than I dislike GHA. :) If that's not workable, then I'm fine with switching the whole setup to GHA.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants