Breaking change of leading tab in unordered list

[ErazerBrecht]

What pain point are you perceiving?.
When using 2 leading tabs in a list it starts seeing it as a code block. Which could make sense
But starting from 4.0.15 it also places them on another level which I really can't explain.

Marked has introduced this breaking change between version 4.0.13 & 4.0.14, and 4.0.15 makes it even worse.
Caused by #2434

Working example 4.0.13
Broken example 4.0.14
Even more broken example 4.0.15

Describe the solution you'd like
A solution where it keeps working as it used to. I checked GitHub and they seem to ignore the tabs.
CommonMark seems to agree this is wrong. Dillinger also ignores it.

[lasmil]

Hi @ErazerBrecht . I played with the example you provided and (I might be wrong) I found that if you use the option: pedantic = true, then you will get the expected response.

I created a PR as well which should add an example of pedantic being false or true with your example (I think it will be useful for anybody who encounters this scenario).

[ErazerBrecht]

Hi @lasmil thx for that idea.
I'll see if I can test that option!

Sincerely,
Brecht