Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

clarify level of support for Markdown flavors #1720

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jul 6, 2020
Merged

clarify level of support for Markdown flavors #1720

merged 1 commit into from Jul 6, 2020

Conversation

vassudanagunta
Copy link
Contributor

@vassudanagunta vassudanagunta commented Jul 6, 2020

fixes

Marked version: 1.1.0 and prior (commit b198b55 and prior)

Markdown flavor: CommonMark and GitHub Flavored Markdown

Description

Contributor

  • Test(s) exist to ensure functionality and minimize regression (if no tests added, list tests covering this PR); or,
  • no tests required for this PR.
  • If submitting new feature, it has been documented in the appropriate places.

Committer

In most cases, this should be a different person than the contributor.

  • Draft GitHub release notes have been updated.
  • CI is green (no forced merge required).
  • Merge PR

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jul 6, 2020

This pull request is being automatically deployed with Vercel (learn more).
To see the status of your deployment, click below or on the icon next to each commit.

🔍 Inspect: https://vercel.com/markedjs/markedjs/qtb64t9o8
✅ Preview: https://markedjs-git-fork-vassudanagunta-docs-patch-1.markedjs.vercel.app

@UziTech UziTech added the category: docs Documentation changes label Jul 6, 2020
@joshbruce joshbruce merged commit 982b57e into markedjs:master Jul 6, 2020
@UziTech UziTech mentioned this pull request Jul 13, 2020
12 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
category: docs Documentation changes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Homepage/docs is misleading about CommonMark/GFM "support"
3 participants