New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes to Functions to include inline and moved benches to criterion to use stable toolchain #555
Conversation
…benches/packet_benchmarks.rs; added inlining to pnet_macros to increase speed of parsing data into packet
Criterion Output
|
@mrmonday et al., can i get a workflow approval? |
The request is be seen by a human. My real message is
Other thing
Feel welcome to hang-out at |
@stappersg thanks, i apologize for the ping. I forgot it was easter week!!! |
I'm surprised the annotations make so much difference - in the past we've removed lots of them because the compiler is "sufficiently smart" that it made no difference. It would be good to get the benchmarks in CI, no need to do that here though. Thanks! |
pent_macro_support/src/packet.rs
pnet_macro/src/decorator.rs
pnet_packet/
Benchmarks Before Changes