Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

build(deps): Update dependency esbuild to ~0.15.8 #3819

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 18, 2022

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Sep 18, 2022

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
esbuild ~0.15.7 -> ~0.15.8 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

evanw/esbuild

v0.15.8

Compare Source

  • Fix JSX name collision edge case (#​2534)

    Code generated by esbuild could have a name collision in the following edge case:

    • The JSX transformation mode is set to automatic, which causes import statements to be inserted
    • An element uses a {...spread} followed by a key={...}, which uses the legacy createElement fallback imported from react
    • Another import uses a name that ends with react such as @remix-run/react
    • The output format has been set to CommonJS so that import statements are converted into require calls

    In this case, esbuild previously generated two variables with the same name import_react, like this:

    var import_react = require("react");
    var import_react2 = require("@​remix-run/react");

    That bug is fixed in this release. The code generated by esbuild no longer contains a name collision.

  • Fall back to WebAssembly on Android ARM (#​1556, #​1578, #​2335, #​2526)

    Go's compiler supports trivial cross-compiling to almost all platforms without installing any additional software other than the Go compiler itself. This has made it very easy for esbuild to publish native binary executables for many platforms. However, it strangely doesn't support cross-compiling to Android ARM without installing the Android build tools.

    So instead of publishing a native esbuild binary executable to npm, this release publishes a WebAssembly fallback build. This is essentially the same as the esbuild-wasm package but it's installed automatically when you install the esbuild package on Android ARM. So packages that depend on the esbuild package should now work on Android ARM. This change has not yet been tested end-to-end because I don't have a 32-bit Android ARM device myself, but in theory it should work.

    This inherits the drawbacks of WebAssembly including significantly slower performance than native as well as potentially also more severe memory usage limitations and lack of certain features (e.g. --serve). If you want to use a native binary executable of esbuild on Android ARM, you may be able to build it yourself from source after installing the Android build tools.

  • Attempt to better support Yarn's ignorePatternData feature (#​2495)

    Part of resolving paths in a project using Yarn's Plug'n'Play feature involves evaluating a regular expression in the ignorePatternData property of .pnp.data.json. However, it turns out that the particular regular expressions generated by Yarn use some syntax that works with JavaScript regular expressions but that does not work with Go regular expressions.

    In this release, esbuild will now strip some of the the problematic syntax from the regular expression before compiling it, which should hopefully allow it to be compiled by Go's regular expression engine. The specific character sequences that esbuild currently strips are as follows:

    • (?!\.)
    • (?!(?:^|\/)\.)
    • (?!\.{1,2}(?:\/|$))
    • (?!(?:^|\/)\.{1,2}(?:\/|$))

    These seem to be used by Yarn to avoid the . and .. path segments in the middle of relative paths. The removal of these character sequences seems relatively harmless in this case since esbuild shouldn't ever generate such path segments. This change should add support to esbuild for Yarn's pnpIgnorePatterns feature.

  • Fix non-determinism issue with legacy block-level function declarations and strict mode (#​2537)

    When function declaration statements are nested inside a block in strict mode, they are supposed to only be available within that block's scope. But in "sloppy mode" (which is what non-strict mode is commonly called), they are supposed to be available within the whole function's scope:

    // This returns 1 due to strict mode
    function test1() {
      'use strict'
      function fn() { return 1 }
      if (true) { function fn() { return 2 } }
      return fn()
    }
    
    // This returns 2 due to sloppy mode
    function test2() {
      function fn() { return 1 }
      if (true) { function fn() { return 2 } }
      return fn()
    }

    To implement this, esbuild compiles these two functions differently to reflect their different semantics:

    function test1() {
      "use strict";
      function fn() {
        return 1;
      }
      if (true) {
        let fn2 = function() {
          return 2;
        };
      }
      return fn();
    }
    function test2() {
      function fn() {
        return 1;
      }
      if (true) {
        let fn2 = function() {
          return 2;
        };
        var fn = fn2;
      }
      return fn();
    }

    However, the compilation had a subtle bug where the automatically-generated function-level symbols for multible hoisted block-level function declarations in the same block a sloppy-mode context were generated in a random order if the output was in strict mode, which could be the case if TypeScript's alwaysStrict setting was set to true. This lead to non-determinism in the output as the minifier would randomly exchange the generated names for these symbols on different runs. This bug has been fixed by sorting the keys of the unordered map before iterating over them.

  • Fix parsing of @keyframes with string identifiers (#​2555)

    Firefox supports @keyframes with string identifier names. Previously this was treated as a syntax error by esbuild as it doesn't work in any other browser. The specification allows for this however, so it's technically not a syntax error (even though it would be unwise to use this feature at the moment). There was also a bug where esbuild would remove the identifier name in this case as the syntax wasn't recognized.

    This release changes esbuild's parsing of @keyframes to now consider this case to be an unrecognized CSS rule. That means it will be passed through unmodified (so you can now use esbuild to bundle this Firefox-specific CSS) but the CSS will not be pretty-printed or minified. I don't think it makes sense for esbuild to have special code to handle this Firefox-specific syntax at this time. This decision can be revisited in the future if other browsers add support for this feature.

  • Add the --jsx-side-effects API option (#​2539, #​2546)

    By default esbuild assumes that JSX expressions are side-effect free, which means they are annoated with /* @​__PURE__ */ comments and are removed during bundling when they are unused. This follows the common use of JSX for virtual DOM and applies to the vast majority of JSX libraries. However, some people have written JSX libraries that don't have this property. JSX expressions can have arbitrary side effects and can't be removed. If you are using such a library, you can now pass --jsx-side-effects to tell esbuild that JSX expressions have side effects so it won't remove them when they are unused.

    This feature was contributed by @​rtsao.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, click this checkbox.

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from kulshekhar as a code owner September 18, 2022 19:15
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Sep 18, 2022

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 3078303195

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.5%) to 96.353%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 3073831589: 0.5%
Covered Lines: 3993
Relevant Lines: 4090

💛 - Coveralls

@ahnpnl ahnpnl merged commit c3d08df into main Sep 18, 2022
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/esbuild-packages branch September 18, 2022 19:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants