Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

kubeadm: make a control-plane's kubelet talk to the local API Server on kubeadm join. #4471

Open
4 tasks
chrischdi opened this issue Feb 1, 2024 · 5 comments
Open
4 tasks
Assignees
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. sig/cluster-lifecycle Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cluster Lifecycle.

Comments

@chrischdi
Copy link
Member

chrischdi commented Feb 1, 2024

Enhancement Description

Please keep this description up to date. This will help the Enhancement Team to track the evolution of the enhancement efficiently.

cc @neolit123 : we discussed that this may not get tracked by enhancement tracking.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. label Feb 1, 2024
@chrischdi chrischdi changed the title kubeadm make a control-plane's kubelet talk to the local API Server on kubeadm join. kubeadm: make a control-plane's kubelet talk to the local API Server on kubeadm join. Feb 1, 2024
@neolit123 neolit123 added the sig/cluster-lifecycle Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cluster Lifecycle. label Feb 2, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. label Feb 2, 2024
@neolit123 neolit123 added the kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. label Feb 2, 2024
@neolit123
Copy link
Member

we discussed that this may not get tracked by enhancement tracking.

yes, we are not going to opt-in for enhancement tracking for this feature.

@neolit123
Copy link
Member

@chrischdi FYI, there is a PR that has been in review for a long time but it may merge in 1.30:
kubernetes/kubernetes#119598

we are thinking of adding a new dedicated join phase behind a feature gate, that waits for all k8s CP components (not etcd) to be ready.
basically ALA wait-control-plane for join.
note that it might conflict / mix things a little with this KEP.

@chrischdi
Copy link
Member Author

@chrischdi FYI, there is a PR that has been in review for a long time but it may merge in 1.30: kubernetes/kubernetes#119598

we are thinking of adding a new dedicated join phase behind a feature gate, that waits for all k8s CP components (not etcd) to be ready. basically ALA wait-control-plane for join. note that it might conflict / mix things a little with this KEP.

Thanks for the heads up: it does not conflict with this proposal :-) it introduces stuff which happens after the parts this touches.

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label May 23, 2024
@neolit123
Copy link
Member

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label May 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. sig/cluster-lifecycle Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cluster Lifecycle.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants