Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor golangci-lint, enable more linters and add github action #1566

Merged

Conversation

vincepri
Copy link
Member

Signed-off-by: Vince Prignano vincepri@vmware.com

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: vincepri

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jun 22, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Jun 22, 2021
@vincepri vincepri force-pushed the golangci-lint-refactor branch 4 times, most recently from afafde7 to 884c0e0 Compare June 22, 2021 17:31
@@ -186,7 +185,7 @@ func (c *multiNamespaceCache) WaitForCacheSync(ctx context.Context) bool {
func (c *multiNamespaceCache) IndexField(ctx context.Context, obj client.Object, field string, extractValue client.IndexerFunc) error {
isNamespaced, err := objectutil.IsAPINamespaced(obj, c.Scheme, c.RESTMapper)
if err != nil {
return nil
return nil //nolint:nilerr
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Was this intentional?

Signed-off-by: Vince Prignano <vincepri@vmware.com>
@christopherhein
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 22, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 1e4d87c into kubernetes-sigs:master Jun 22, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v0.9.x milestone Jun 22, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants