Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ensure KubernetesInformerFactoryProcessor does not access any beans #1532

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 18, 2021

Conversation

dsyer
Copy link
Contributor

@dsyer dsyer commented Feb 8, 2021

A BeanDefinitionRegistryPostProcessor should not ideally refer to any
bean instances, except lazily. This change makes the bean definitions
that are installed by a @KubernetesInformer lazier by putting them
behind a Supplier

See also #1516

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/invalid-commit-message Indicates that a PR should not merge because it has an invalid commit message. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Feb 8, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 8, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@asavov asavov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great starter. Still IMO needs some polishing.

@dsyer dsyer force-pushed the informers branch 2 times, most recently from b498e2b to e6b964e Compare February 9, 2021 08:06
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/invalid-commit-message Indicates that a PR should not merge because it has an invalid commit message. label Feb 9, 2021
A `BeanDefinitionRegistryPostProcessor` should not ideally refer to any
bean instances, except lazily. This change makes the bean definitions
that are installed by an `<at>KubernetesInformer` lazier by putting them
behind a `Supplier`

Signed-off-by: Dave Syer <dsyer@vmware.com>
Copy link
Member

@yue9944882 yue9944882 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@dsyer @asavov thanks! (sry for delaying, just got back from lunar new year PTO)

@yue9944882
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 18, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dsyer, yue9944882

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants